Showing posts with label Prosecution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Prosecution. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

KARNATAKA MINING SCAM: Will act on illegal mining report - Shivaraj Patil!


For LEED Consultancy / IGBC Certifications, Green Building Design, Green Homes, Green Factory Buildings, Green SEZs, Green Townships & Energy Audits - www.greentekindika.com

PTI / The Hindu / BANGALORE, August 9, 2011.

Karnataka Lokayukta Shivaraj Patil addressing the media in Bangalore on Tuesday. Photo: K. Gopinathan
Karnataka Lokayukta Shivaraj Patil addressing the media in Bangalore on Tuesday. Photo: K. Gopinathan - The Hindu.

Karnataka Lokayukta Shivaraj Patil on Tuesday said he will act on the illegal mining report submitted by his predecessor and Governor Bhardwaj’s recommendation to initiate criminal proceedings against indicted former chief minister B.S. Yeddyurappa.

“I have almost read the voluminous mining scam report. I will examine the provisions available under the law to initiate action in this regard,” he told reporters here.

He also said he would read the governor’s letter and take appropriate steps to initiate criminal proceedings against Mr. Yeddyurappa, who had to quit as chief minister following the indictment by previous Lokayukta Santosh Hegde.

Mr. Bhardwaj had recommended the Lokayukta to initiate criminal proceedings against Mr. Yeddyurappa.

To another question, Mr. Patil said Lokayukta police would probe the complaint against Mr. Yeddyurappa, alleging irregularities in the Upper Bhadra irrigation project, which was referred to it for probe by a local court on Monday.


Full Story at,

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

PURULIA ARMS DROP CASE: India to initiate fresh moves to bring Davy to justice!


For LEED Consultancy, Green Building Design, Green Homes, Green Factory Buildings, Green SEZs, Green Townships,


August 3, 2011 / PTI, New Delhi / DC.

India will soon be sending a fresh proposal to Denmark seeking a trial of Purulia arms drop case accused Kim Davy through video conferencing from Danish capital Copenhagen and getting his deposition before a team of officials is sent from here.
CBI, probing the case, will take a legal opinion on the matter soon but the agency is open to trial through video conferencing from Copenhagen as the Danish High Court had in a verdict turned down its plea of extraditing Davy, official sources said.
The decision to seek trial by video conferencing was arrived after a through review meeting between CBI and the Home Ministry, after which the proposal of getting Davy deposition by sending a team of officials from here was agreed upon, the sources said.


Full Story at,

EGYPTIAN REVOLUTION-II: Mubarak goes on trial in hospital bed, denies charges!


For LEED Consultancy, Green Building Design, Green Homes, Green Factory Buildings, Green SEZs, Green Townships,


AP / The Hindu/ CAIRO, August 3, 2011.

This video image taken from Egyptian State Television shows 83-year-old Hosni Mubarak laying on a hospital bed inside a cage of mesh and iron bars in a Cairo courtroom. Photo: AP
This video image taken from Egyptian State Television shows 83-year-old Hosni Mubarak laying on a hospital bed inside a cage of mesh and iron bars in a Cairo courtroom. Photo: AP.

Mr. Mubarak, his former Interior Minister Habib el-Adly, and six top police officers are charged with murder and attempted murder in connection with the protesters killed during the uprising, according to the official charge sheet. All eight could face the death penalty if convicted.
In a historic trial, an ailing, 83-year-old Hosni Mubarak, lying ashen-faced on a hospital bed inside a metal defendants’ cage with his two sons beside him in white prison uniforms, denied charges of complicity in the killings of protestors and of corruption.

The spectacle, aired live on state television, was the biggest humiliation for Egypt’s former president since his ouster nearly six months ago. But it went a long way to satisfy one of the key demands that has united protesters since Feb. 11, the day the regime was toppled.
It was the first time Egyptians have seen Mubarak since Feb. 10, when he gave a defiant TV address refusing to resign.

“I am delighted that I see them in a cage. I feel that my son’s soul is finally starting to be at rest and that his blood will cool,” said Saeeda Hassan Abdel-Raouf, the mother of a 22-year-old protester who was among those killed in the uprising. She spoke outside the trial venue at a Cairo police academy.

Mr. Mubarak, his former Interior Minister Habib el-Adly, and six top police officers are charged with murder and attempted murder in connection with the protesters killed during the uprising, according to the official charge sheet. All eight could face the death penalty if convicted.

Separately, Mubarak and his two sons – one-time heir apparent Gamal and wealthy businessman Alaa - face charges of corruption. The two sets of charges have been lumped together in one mass trial.

Outside the police academy where the trial was being held, hundreds of Mubarak’s opponents and angry supporters scuffled sporadically, throwing stones and bottles at each other while riot police with shields and helmets tried to keep them apart. About 50 supporters pounded on the steel gate trying to get into the compound, chanting “We Love you, Mubarak!” until police charged at them with electrified batons and dispersed them.

The clashes were a sign of the profound emotions stirred by the unprecedented prosecution of the man who ruled Egypt with unquestioned power for 29 years.

For many Egyptians, the trial is a chance at retribution for decades of oppressive rule in which opponents were tortured, corruption was rife, poverty spread and political life was stifled. But for others, Mr. Mubarak was a symbol of stability.

Mr. Mubarak was wheeled into the defendant’s cage on a hospital bed, a sheet pulled up to his chest alongside his nine co-defendants, including his sons Mr. Gamal and Mr. Alaa, his former interior minister Habib el-Adly and six top former police officials. Though he was pale and his eyes were ringed with red, he appeared alert and aware of what was going on. He showed little discernible emotion.

From time to time, Mr. Mubarak craned his head to see the proceedings. Other times, he crooked his elbow over his face as if in exhaustion. While the other defendants sat on wooden benches in the cage, Mr. Gamal and Mr. Alaa stood protectively next to their father’s bed in their white prison uniforms, leaning over at times to talk to him.

Defendants are traditionally held in cages during trials in Egypt. About an hour after the session began, there was a recess and the defendants were led out of the cage.

A success for the revolution

Up to the last minute, many Egyptians had doubted that Mr. Mubarak would actually appear at the trial. It was inconceivable that the man who vowed to rule the country until his last breath and who kept a near total grip on the levers of power, whose name once crowned public buildings around the country, could actually be brought to trial.


Full Story at,

KARNATAKA MINING SCAM: Governor sanctions prosecution of Yeddyurappa!

For LEED Consultancy, Green Building Design, Green Homes, Green Factory Buildings, Green SEZs, Green Townships,


Express News Service The New Indian Express / Posted on Aug 03, 2011 at 12:49pm IST.

BANGALORE: In fresh trouble for B S Yeddyurappa, Karnataka Governor H R Bhardwaj today gave sanction to Lokayukta police to initiate criminal proceedings against him over the report on illegal mining.


Bhardwaj accepted the findings and recommendation of the Lokayukta in Chapter 22 of the report for initiating criminal proceedings against Yeddyurappa, a Raj Bhavan communique said.

The Governor's sanction came a week after the Lokayukta sent a copy of the report to Bhardwaj.

It said the Governor, the competent authority under the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, took the decision after having carefully examined the report, along with relevant annexures, with reference to provisions of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1994 and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.


Full Story at,

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

SHAME OF MEDIA: U.S. Could Prosecute Murdoch!

FOR LIGHT READING, Download your free copy of “My First Beer” Now with the Smashwords Summer/Winter promotion, ending July 31, 2011

Michael Tomasky / thedailybeast.com / Jul 19, 2011 4:59 PM EDT.

Britain Phone Hacking

With Rupert Murdoch in deep legal trouble in the U.K., Michael Tomasky looks at the American law that could be used to bring the mogul up on civil charges in the U.S.

We’ve seen many mentions these last few days of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.S. law under which some suggest Rupert Murdoch could be prosecuted. But is it really plausible that Murdoch and/or his News Corp. could be prosecuted in the United States for alleged bribes paid to British police officers by British employees of its British sister company? Yes, it is. So says the act, and so say two legal experts I spoke with Tuesday who have extensive experience in working with the law.
Click here to find out more!
The FCPA became law in 1977 at a time, says New York attorney Roland Riopelle of Sercarz & Riopelle, of “rampant corporate corruption overseas.” It was designed to create a domestic remedy for misbehavior by U.S. corporations abroad. A typical FCPA prosecution might involve something like going after an official of a U.S.-based company for paying a bribe to an official in a foreign country to win a government contract. There are both civil and criminal jurisdictions to such prosecutions. The Securities & Exchange Commission often has jurisdiction over such prosecutions, in conjunction with the Department of Justice. Almost all such prosecutions are brought by the DOJ itself—and not, say, a local U.S. Attorney’s Office like the mighty Southern District of New York—because the cases “are felt to have international financial implications,” Riopelle says.
Riopelle, a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District, says there is no doubt that bribes allegedly paid to British police officers would expose News Corp. to prosecution in America under the FCPA. He does think, however, that it would be somewhat abnormal. “Paying a police officer to get information about a pending investigation isn’t the typical FCPA prosecution,” he says. More typically, the United States brings a prosecution—for example, against an employee bribing a developing-world contracting official—because the host country lacks the will or resources to punish the official or the company.

Full Story at,